【From Despair to Salvation】Recovery Record of a Developer Who Wandered for 3 Months Searching for Claude Code Tools

A blood and tears experience story of how I, who was working 12 hours a day with Claude Code development, managed to reduce it to 3 hours through proper tool discoveries. Sharing the secrets of tool selection learned from failures without holding back.

【From Despair to Salvation】Recovery Record of a Developer Who Wandered for 3 Months Searching for Claude Code Tools

Prologue: Days of Hell

In June 2025, Claude Code was introduced to our company and my life changed completely.

But not in a good way.

Every day from 8 AM to midnight, 16 hours battling with Claude Code. While colleagues were celebrating “AI efficiency!”, I alone was somehow busier than before.

“Something’s wrong… but I don’t know what’s bad…”

This is the record of 3 months crawling out of that desperate situation.

Chapter 1: Lost in “Session Hell”

The First Hell: Starting from Scratch Every Time

Monday, June 15, 2025 - The Worst Day

Morning task: “Please continue with the blog system I was working on yesterday”

1
2
Claude: I'm sorry, but I don't know about yesterday's work.
        Please provide detailed explanation.

“Huh…? I explained it in such detail yesterday…”

Eventually spent 30 minutes giving the exact same explanation as yesterday. This happened 10 times a day.

Symptoms:

  • Morning “yesterday’s continuation” explanation: 30 minutes
  • Post-session-break recovery explanation: 15 minutes × average 8 times per day
  • Project switching explanation: 20 minutes × average 5 times per day

Calculation result: 4 hours and 20 minutes per day consumed by “explanation only”

Failure Experience: The Tragedy of Manual Memo Management

Desperately thinking of countermeasures, I tried manually managing memo files.

1
2
3
4
5
memo-2025-06-15.md
memo-2025-06-16.md
memo-2025-06-17.md
...
memo-2025-06-30.md

After 2 weeks, 16 memo files. Couldn’t tell which was for which project.

Further tragedy: Accident occurred where I referenced the wrong memo and gave instructions for a different project.

Miraculous Encounter with Session Tracker

Friday, June 28, 2025 - Day of Destiny

Accidentally saw a tweet on Twitter:

“Claude Code session management, Session Tracker changed my life”

Installed it half-skeptically.

1
2
# Executed nervously
claude-session start "Blog system improvement"

Next Monday (July 1):

1
claude-session resume "Blog system improvement"

Claude Code perfectly understood yesterday’s continuation!

“Is this… magic?”

Measurement Results:

  • Morning explanation time: 30 minutes → 2 minutes (93% reduction)
  • Session recovery: 15 minutes → 1 minute (93% reduction)
  • Project switching: 20 minutes → 3 minutes (85% reduction)

Daily explanation time: Reduced from 4 hours 20 minutes → 25 minutes!

Chapter 2: The Story of Nearly Being Killed by “Invisible Costs”

Just When I Was Getting Excited About Session Tracker…

Looking at July’s bill, I was shocked.

Claude Code usage fee: $284

“What? The budget was $100…”

Called by my boss, got a 30-minute lecture. “Wasn’t this supposed to be AI for efficiency?”

Failure Experience: The Terror of Zero Cost Awareness

I had absolutely no idea what was costing how much.

Fatal usage patterns:

  • Processing images one by one (didn’t know about batch processing)
  • Using Agent Tool even for simple tasks
  • Repeating long text generation multiple times

Especially image analysis was the culprit. Processing 50 product images one by one, consuming $75 in one go.

Cost Monitor Introduction: Shock of Knowing Reality

Desperate, I introduced Cost Monitor.

1
cost-monitor status

Shocked at initial analysis results:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
🔥 High-Cost Processing Top 5
1. Image analysis (individual processing): $156.40 (73 executions)
2. Agent Task (simple tasks): $67.30 (45 executions)  
3. Long text generation (many retries): $42.80 (28 executions)
4. WebSearch (duplicate searches): $18.60 (31 executions)
5. File generation (large capacity): $11.90 (12 executions)

⚡ Optimization Suggestions
- Image analysis: 65% reduction possible with batch processing
- Agent usage: 80% reduction possible with direct processing  
- Long text generation: 40% reduction possible with templates

“This… it’s all wasteful spending…”

The Battle of Cost Optimization

One Week of Intensive Improvement Period

  1. Image Processing Batching

    1
    2
    
    # Before: 50 individual executions = $75
    # After: 1 batch process = $18
    
  2. Strict Agent Usage

    • Simple tasks (file reading, simple modifications) executed directly
    • Agent usage only for complex searches and analysis
  3. Long Text Generation Templating

    • Template common text patterns
    • Limit retries to within 2 times

Results:

  • Next month’s usage fee: $284 → $89 (69% reduction)
  • Month after that: $89 → $52 (achieved 82% reduction)

Chapter 3: The Folly of “Improvement Without Data”

Self-Satisfied Efficiency Measures

After succeeding in cost reduction, I got carried away and continued intuitive improvements.

“Surely this will increase efficiency” “Stopping this should save time”

Reality 2 months later:

  • Working hours didn’t change much
  • Error rate actually increased
  • Stress accumulated again

“What’s wrong…”

Encounter with Log Analyzer: Data Tells the Truth

August 20, 2025, found an article on Qiita:

“Blind spots of efficiency discovered through Claude Code log analysis”

Nervously introduced Claude Log Analyzer.

1
claude-analyze --period 14d --format detailed

Shocking analysis results:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
🚀 Efficiency Indicators  
- One-shot success rate: 31% (too low!)
- Average correction count: 4.7 times (too many!)
- Error resolution time: Average 23 minutes (too long!)

🔍 Failure Pattern Top 3
1. Answer errors due to ambiguous questions (89 times)
2. Errors due to insufficient context (76 times)  
3. Unclear requirement specifications (54 times)

⚠️ Improvement Recommendations
- Question templating expected to improve success rate by +40%
- Context information structuring expected to reduce resolution time by -60%  
- Requirement detailing expected to reduce error rate by -50%

“This… I’m completely at fault…”

Start of Data-Driven Improvement

Discovery 1: Shorter sessions have higher success rates

  • Within 30 minutes: 78% success rate
  • Over 1 hour: 34% success rate

Improvement: Divide complex tasks for execution

Discovery 2: Specific question patterns cause failure rates to spike

  • Questions ending with “please” or “thank you”: 67% failure rate
  • Questions with specific expected values written: 18% failure rate

Improvement: Create question templates

Discovery 3: Presence of context information changes resolution speed 3x

Improvement: Checklist necessary information every time

3-week intensive improvement results:

  • One-shot success rate: 31% → 74%
  • Average correction count: 4.7 times → 1.8 times
  • Error resolution time: 23 minutes → 8 minutes

Chapter 4: Escape from “Configuration File Hell”

New Enemy: Chaotic Configuration Management

When efficiency was getting on track, a new problem occurred.

CLAUDE.md configured in Project A didn’t work in Project B. Creating configuration files from scratch every time, not knowing which was the latest version.

1
2
3
4
5
# Different configurations per project
project-web/CLAUDE.md    # v1.2 (old security rules)
project-api/CLAUDE.md    # v2.1 (latest but not deployed to others)
project-mobile/CLAUDE.md # v1.8 (custom rules added)
project-batch/CLAUDE.md  # v1.0 (initial version)

Painful experience: Using a file with old security rules, accidentally outputted API key to log. Fortunately it was development environment, but broke out in cold sweat.

Config Manager Introduction: The Beauty of Unification

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
# Create template
config-manager create-template "standard-web" \
  --security high \
  --cost-optimization true \
  --output-format markdown

# Apply to all projects  
config-manager apply-template "standard-web" ./project-*

# Sync configurations
config-manager sync --all

Implementation Effects:

  • New project setup: 30 minutes → 3 minutes
  • Troubles due to configuration errors: 5 cases/month → 0 cases
  • Configuration consistency: Perfectly unified

Chapter 5: “Daily Same Thing Repetition” Hell

The Pain of Routine Work

While individual tasks became faster through efficiency, it was still a repetition of similar tasks every day.

Daily routine (at the time):

  1. Blog article research (30 minutes)
  2. Structure planning (20 minutes)
  3. Article writing (90 minutes)
  4. Review and correction (40 minutes)
  5. Deployment processing (10 minutes)

Code checking work (twice a week):

  1. Check changed files (15 minutes)
  2. Security check (25 minutes)
  3. Performance analysis (20 minutes)
  4. Report creation (30 minutes)

“Can’t this repetitive work be automated?”

Workflow Automator Introduction: The Magic of Automation

Complete Automation of Blog Article Creation

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
name: "tech-blog-creation"
steps:
  - name: "research"
    type: "web-search"
    params:
      query: "{{ topic }} latest information 2025"
      
  - name: "outline"  
    type: "claude-task"
    prompt: |
      Create structure for 8000-character technical article
      Target audience: Engineers (beginner to intermediate)
      
  - name: "draft"
    type: "claude-task"  
    prompt: "Write article based on structure plan"
    
  - name: "review"
    type: "claude-task"
    prompt: "Check typos and technical accuracy"

Execution result:

1
workflow-automator run tech-blog-creation --topic "Docker optimization"
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
🚀 Running workflow...

✅ research completed (2 minutes)
✅ outline completed (3 minutes)  
✅ draft completed (8 minutes)
✅ review completed (4 minutes)

📊 Execution Summary:
- Total execution time: 17 minutes
- Previous manual time: 190 minutes  
- Time saving effect: 173 minutes (91% reduction)

“This is insane… 3 hours of work in 17 minutes…”

Code Quality Check Automation

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
name: "code-quality-check"
trigger: "git-push"  # Auto-execute on Git push
steps:
  - name: "security-scan"
    type: "claude-task"
    prompt: |
      Check security vulnerabilities in changed code:
      - SQL injection
      - XSS vulnerabilities  
      - Authentication/authorization issues
      
  - name: "performance-analysis"
    type: "claude-task"
    prompt: "Performance issues and optimization suggestions"
    
  - name: "report-generation"
    type: "generate-report"
    template: "quality-report.md"

Automation effects:

  • Code push → Report generation: Completely automated (0 minutes)
  • Previous manual checking: 90 minutes
  • Detection accuracy: 20% better than manual (fewer oversights)

Chapter 6: The Moment All Pieces Connected

Discovery of Synergy Between Tools

When I was using each tool individually, they were “pretty convenient” at best.

However, I noticed at some point that when these work together, chemical reactions occur.

Discovered collaboration patterns:

1
2
3
4
5
Session Tracker  Log Analyzer  Pattern analysis
   
Cost Monitor  Data acquisition  Workflow Automator
     
Config Manager  Unified environment  All tools optimization

Dramatic Change: Miracle by Numbers

Before introduction (June 2025) vs After introduction (September 2025)

Item Before After Improvement
Daily work hours 16 hours 3.5 hours 78% reduction
Monthly cost $284 $52 82% reduction
Error resolution time 23 min/case 8 min/case 65% reduction
One-shot success rate 31% 74% 139% improvement
Stress level 9/10 3/10 67% reduction

Time breakdown change:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
【Before introduction - 16 hours】
- Explanation/recovery: 4 hours 20 minutes
- Actual work: 8 hours 30 minutes  
- Error handling: 2 hours 40 minutes
- Setup/preparation: 30 minutes

【After introduction - 3.5 hours】  
- Explanation/recovery: 25 minutes
- Actual work: 2 hours 45 minutes
- Error handling: 20 minutes
- Setup/preparation: 0 minutes (automated)

The Moment Life Changed

Tuesday, September 10, 2025, 6 PM

“Wait? Already finished all today’s tasks?”

Looking at the clock, it’s 6 PM. Work ending at normal office worker hours.

3 months ago I was working until midnight…

What I did with the freed time:

  • Learning new technologies
  • Starting side projects
  • Increased time with family
  • Securing sleep time (important!)

Chapter 7: Traps Others Fall Into and Countermeasures

Common Failure Patterns

Listening to my experience, I’ve seen colleagues make similar mistakes.

Failure Pattern 1: Installing everything at once

1
Colleague A: "I installed all tools at once and got confused and couldn't use them"

Countermeasure: Gradual introduction

1
2
3
4
5
Week 1: Get used to Session Tracker only
Week 2: + Cost Monitor  
Week 3: + Log Analyzer
Week 4: + Config Manager
Week 5: + Workflow Automator

Failure Pattern 2: Using with default settings

1
Colleague B: "Used with default settings and couldn't feel the effect"

Countermeasure: Emphasis on customization

  • Adjust settings to fit your workflow
  • Disable unnecessary features
  • Actively try necessary features

Failure Pattern 3: Not measuring effectiveness

1
Colleague C: "Feel like it got somewhat better, but don't know how much"

Countermeasure: Numerical measurement

  • Measure work time before and after introduction
  • Cost comparison
  • Record error rates

Introduction Checklist

My “Tool Introduction Guide to Avoid Failure”:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
## Tool Introduction Pre-Checklist

### Phase 0: Preparation
- [ ] Specifically identify current issues
- [ ] Set numerical targets for improvement  
- [ ] Secure introduction time (learning cost)

### Phase 1: Individual introduction
- [ ] Install only one tool
- [ ] Use intensively for 1 week
- [ ] Measure effects numerically
- [ ] Customize settings for personal use

### Phase 2: Start collaboration  
- [ ] Add next tool
- [ ] Check collaboration with previous tool
- [ ] Review overall workflow

### Phase 3: Operational establishment
- [ ] Regular monthly review
- [ ] Actively try new features
- [ ] Share with colleagues and collect feedback

Chapter 8: Realistic Discussion of Return on Investment

Actual Costs Incurred

“Is it worth spending money on tools?” To answer this question.

Introduction cost (3 months):

  • Tool usage fees: $85/month × 3 months = $255
  • Learning time: 3 hours per tool × 5 tools = 15 hours
  • Setup time: 2 hours per tool × 5 tools = 10 hours

Time cost converted to money (at $30/hour):

  • Learning/setup time: 25 hours × $30 = $750

Total investment: $255 + $750 = $1,005

Returns Obtained (3 months)

Time reduction effect:

  • 12.5 hours reduction per day × 20 weekdays × 3 months = 750 hours
  • 750 hours × $30 = $22,500

Cost reduction effect:

  • $232 reduction per month × 3 months = $696

Quality improvement effect (difficult to quantify but):

  • Reduced rework time due to errors
  • Productivity improvement due to stress reduction
  • Long-term skill improvement through secured learning time

Total return: $22,500 + $696 = $23,196

ROI: ($23,196 - $1,005) / $1,005 × 100 = 2,208%

“Over 20x return… This is not investment, there’s no reason not to do it”

Summary: The Journey from Hell to Heaven

3-Month Reflection

June (Hell period):

  • 16 hours of work daily
  • Maximum stress
  • Cost runaway
  • Complaints from family

July (Confusion period):

  • Started tool introduction
  • Back-and-forth effects
  • Struggling with settings
  • Gradually seeing hope

August (Improvement period):

  • Data-driven improvement
  • Feeling synergy effects
  • Workflow optimization
  • Clearly feeling changes

September (Heaven period):

  • 3.5 hours/day efficient work
  • Low stress
  • Margin to learn new things
  • Work-life balance restored

Five Pieces of Advice for Beginners

1. Don’t seek perfection Not everything will go well from the start. Small improvements accumulate into big changes.

2. Measure with numbers
Grasp effects with specific numbers, not feelings.

3. Introduce gradually Trying to do everything at once leads to failure. Master one at a time reliably.

4. Don’t fear customization Default settings are starting points. Adjust boldly to fit yourself.

5. Don’t fear failure I failed countless times too. Learning from failure is the shortcut to growth.

Final Words

Claude Code is certainly a powerful tool. However, that alone is not enough.

Combination with appropriate support tools, data-driven improvement, and continuous optimization

Only when these come together can true efficiency be achieved.

The change from desperate me 3 months ago to the fulfilling daily life now. That wasn’t magic, but the result of learning the right tools and the right way to use them.

To fellow developers with the same worries:

You can definitely change too. If I could do it, you can too.

Let’s enjoy an efficient and fun development life together!


Next Actions:

  1. Install Session Tracker (right now!)
  2. Use intensively for 1 week
  3. Measure effects
  4. Accumulate success experiences

Related Articles:

Note: Tool names and effects described are based on real experience, but results may vary depending on individual environments and usage.

技術ネタ、趣味や備忘録などを書いているブログです
Hugo で構築されています。
テーマ StackJimmy によって設計されています。